Separate proposals from signing
An AI BOT approval covers a specific plan. Changes to the account, material parameters or execution scope require another check and approval. Autonomous AI trading is designed to choose opportunities within an explicitly authorized scope; its independent authorization and continuous operation remain under development. Signing in, connecting, reading data and executing trades are distinct permissions.
Expiry is not proof of liquidation
A session limits when execution is authorized. Exit attempts before expiry still depend on liquidity, price checks, network conditions and successful transactions. Residual holdings require continued inspection.
Pause, revoke and recover
Pausing new trades does not sell existing holdings. Ending a bot requires an explicit choice to retain holdings or request an exit; actual receipts establish the outcome. Partial fills, unconfirmed orders and residual holdings still need reconciliation. Query the original operation when its result is unknown rather than treating a timeout as failure and submitting again.
Pause, revoke and recover Check authorization, pauses and order states separately. Revoked access does not prove a position has closed.
Waiting needs a record too
Declined actions, partial fills, unknown transaction states and retries need understandable reasons. Review orders, fills and chain evidence rather than treating a submitted request as completion.
After a pause, check each state separately
Suppose a session is paused while an earlier transaction is still awaiting confirmation. First check that transaction, actual asset balances and remaining permissions. Pausing the scheduler does not establish that the transaction was cancelled. Base any further exit action on confirmed state to avoid submitting it twice.
A complete record links the intended action, submission identifier, confirmed outcome and remaining assets. It should answer three separate questions: what authority remains, what has happened, and what assets still need attention. A model's written response cannot replace account and on-chain facts.
Current evidence covers adapted grid and bounded DCA versions in local simulation. Catalog inclusion does not establish executability, and joint acceptance of two BOT flows is still pending. Simulation records cannot prove real fills or a live trading connection.